Large Abercrombie & Fitch Employees Forced to Wear Men’s Clothing

Accelerating U.S. Economy May Put Fed Asset Purchases On Hold

Slutty prep outfitter Abercrombie & Fitch has been criticized recently for not offering women’s XL or XXL sizes, a function of its mission to only “go after the cool kids.” As CEO Mike Jeffries told Salon in 2006, “That’s why we hire good-looking people in our stores. Because good-looking people attract other good-looking people, and we want to market to cool, good-looking people. We don’t market to anyone other than that.” Anyone who’s ever shopped in Soho knows that this isn’t limited to A&F; many retailers only hire salespeople attractive enough to serve as models for the brand. At A&F, the discriminationgoes all the way to the top.

Kjerstin Gruys, a sociologist who recently wrote a memoir about giving up mirrors for a year, first became interested in the politics of clothing size while working for A&F at the corporate level, as a merchant in the outerwear division. Also writing in Salon, Gruys recalls that, even at the company headquarters, grown-ass women were expected to dress “on brand,” in the latest season of tiny clothing made for teenagers.

“I squeezed myself into the second-largest A&F women’s size available — an 8 — and dieted to stay that size. It terrified me to know that if I gained weight and sized out of their women’s clothes, I’d have to wear ill-fitting men’s T-shirts and sweatshirts to work every day, as I’d seen other ‘large’ women do.”

The Department of Labor doesn’t even have a term for this middle-school-level workplace hostility.

More from Maria Di Benedetti

Could Lilly Pulitzer Be the Fashion Brand That’s Best at Social Media?

Spend any time searching for the fashion brands with the most impressive...
Read More

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.